FirePro W5170M vs Radeon HD 6970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6970 with FirePro W5170M, including specs and performance data.

HD 6970
2010
2 GB GDDR5, 550 Watt
7.34
+29.2%

HD 6970 outperforms W5170M by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking535598
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.06no data
Power efficiency2.05no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameCaymanTropo
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date14 December 2010 (13 years ago)25 August 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$369 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536640
Core clock speedno data900 MHz
Boost clock speed880 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)550 Wattno data
Texture fill rate84.4837.00
Floating-point processing power2.703 TFLOPS1.184 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs9640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity++
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
CrossFire+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6970 7.34
+29.2%
W5170M 5.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6970 2831
+29.2%
W5170M 2191

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 6970 3470
+19.3%
W5170M 2909

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
+20%
25
−20%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.30no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+36.1%
35−40
−36.1%
Hitman 3 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+25%
20−22
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+10.2%
45−50
−10.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+36.1%
35−40
−36.1%
Hitman 3 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+25%
20−22
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+10.2%
45−50
−10.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+36.1%
35−40
−36.1%
Hitman 3 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+25%
20−22
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+10.2%
45−50
−10.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Hitman 3 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+30.6%
35−40
−30.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hitman 3 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

This is how HD 6970 and W5170M compete in popular games:

  • HD 6970 is 20% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6970 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6970 is ahead in 68 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.34 5.68
Recency 14 December 2010 25 August 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

HD 6970 has a 29.2% higher aggregate performance score.

W5170M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 6970 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W5170M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6970 is a desktop card while FirePro W5170M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6970
Radeon HD 6970
AMD FirePro W5170M
FirePro W5170M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 156 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 81 vote

Rate FirePro W5170M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.