ATI Radeon E2400 vs HD 6950

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking558not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.04no data
Power efficiency2.34no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameCaymanRV610
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date14 December 2010 (13 years ago)28 June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140840
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,640 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate70.402.400
Floating-point processing power2.253 TFLOPS0.048 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs884

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-II
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data11.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1110.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6950 2612
+5022%
ATI E2400 51

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2010 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 25 Watt

HD 6950 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI E2400, on the other hand, has 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6950 and Radeon E2400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6950 is a desktop card while Radeon E2400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6950
Radeon HD 6950
ATI Radeon E2400
Radeon E2400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 218 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.