ATI 3D Rage PRO AGP vs Radeon HD 6950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking555not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.04no data
Power efficiency2.45no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Rage 3 (1997−1998)
GPU code nameCaymanRage 3
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date14 December 2010 (13 years ago)1 March 1997 (27 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408no data
Core clock speedno data75 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,640 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Wattno data
Texture fill rate70.400.08
Floating-point processing power2.253 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs881

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 2x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz75 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data600.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x VGA
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 116.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2010 1 March 1997
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 350 nm

HD 6950 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6950 and 3D Rage PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6950
Radeon HD 6950
ATI 3D Rage PRO AGP
3D Rage PRO AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 217 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate 3D Rage PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.