Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon HD 6930

Place in performance ranking	514	52
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	10.59
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Cayman	TU102
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	1 December 2011 (12 years ago)	13 August 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$180	$9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	4608
Core clock speed	750 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	2,640 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	186 Watt	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	60.00	509.8
Floating-point performance	1,920.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	220 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.20	50.46
Recency	1 December 2011	13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	186 Watt	260 Watt

HD 6930 has 39.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000, on the other hand, has a 600.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6930 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6930 is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.