Quadro FX 1800 vs Radeon HD 6930

Place in the ranking	536	1098
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.01	0.01
Power efficiency	2.72	1.22
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Cayman	G94
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	1 December 2011 (12 years ago)	30 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$180	$489

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 6930 has 20000% better value for money than FX 1800.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	64
Core clock speed	750 MHz	550 MHz
Number of transistors	2,640 million	505 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	186 Watt	59 Watt
Texture fill rate	60.00	17.60
Floating-point processing power	1.92 TFLOPS	0.176 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	12
TMUs	80	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	220 mm	198 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	768 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	38.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.0	4.0
OpenGL	4.4	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	-	1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.27	1.03
Recency	1 December 2011	30 March 2009
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	768 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	186 Watt	59 Watt

HD 6930 has a 605.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

FX 1800, on the other hand, has 215.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 6930 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 1800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6930 is a desktop card while Quadro FX 1800 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.