GeForce GTX 260 vs Radeon HD 6930

Place in the ranking	533	744
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.00	0.14
Power efficiency	2.71	1.21
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code name	Cayman	GT200
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 December 2011 (12 years ago)	16 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$180	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 6930 has 1329% better value for money than GTX 260.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	192
Core clock speed	750 MHz	576 MHz
Number of transistors	2,640 million	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	186 Watt	182 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	105 °C
Texture fill rate	60.00	36.86
Floating-point processing power	1.92 TFLOPS	0.4769 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	28
TMUs	80	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	220 mm	267 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	2x 6-pin
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	896 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	448 Bit
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	999 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	111.9 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	Dual Link DVIHDTV
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	S/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.0	4.0
OpenGL	4.4	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.26	3.16
Recency	1 December 2011	16 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	896 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	186 Watt	182 Watt

HD 6930 has a 129.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 14.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 260, on the other hand, has 2.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 6930 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 260 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.