Tesla P40 vs Radeon HD 6850M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6850M with Tesla P40, including specs and performance data.

HD 6850M
2011
1 GB GDDR3, 50 Watt
2.03

Tesla P40 outperforms HD 6850M by a whopping 1456% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking892182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.83
Power efficiency2.838.79
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGranvilleGP102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)13 September 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8003840
Core clock speed675 MHz1303 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1531 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate27.00367.4
Floating-point processing power1.08 TFLOPS11.76 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs40240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1808 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s347.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p20
−1400%
300−350
+1400%
Full HD24
−1358%
350−400
+1358%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data16.28

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1400%
120−130
+1400%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1400%
120−130
+1400%
Dota 2 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
Fortnite 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−1400%
300−310
+1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1400%
120−130
+1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
World of Tanks 35−40
−1438%
600−650
+1438%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1400%
120−130
+1400%
Dota 2 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−1400%
300−310
+1400%

1440p
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
World of Tanks 12−14
−1438%
200−210
+1438%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Valorant 8−9
−1400%
120−130
+1400%

4K
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1433%
230−240
+1433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1433%
230−240
+1433%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Dota 2 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%

This is how HD 6850M and Tesla P40 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla P40 is 1400% faster in 900p
  • Tesla P40 is 1358% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.03 31.58
Recency 4 January 2011 13 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 250 Watt

HD 6850M has 400% lower power consumption.

Tesla P40, on the other hand, has a 1455.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla P40 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6850M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6850M is a notebook card while Tesla P40 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6850M
Radeon HD 6850M
NVIDIA Tesla P40
Tesla P40

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 14 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6850M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 195 votes

Rate Tesla P40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6850M or Tesla P40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.