Playstation 4 Slim GPU vs Radeon HD 6790

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking680not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.76no data
Power efficiency1.93no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameBartsLiverpool 16nm
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 April 2011 (13 years ago)7 September 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8001152
Core clock speed840 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate33.6057.60
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPS1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4072

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length198 mm288 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth134.4 GB/s176.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1*
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 April 2011 7 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 75 Watt

Playstation 4 Slim GPU has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6790 and Playstation 4 Slim GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 6790
AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 153 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6790 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 127 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.