UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Radeon HD 6770M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6770M and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6770M
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
2.50

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) outperforms HD 6770M by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking825745
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.958.70
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameWhistlerIce Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48032
Core clock speed725 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate17.40no data
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6770M 2.50
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 3.14
+25.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6770M 1328
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 2127
+60.2%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6770M 6107
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 8750
+43.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 6770M 980
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 1521
+55.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p23
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Full HD24
+84.6%
13
−84.6%
1200p12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
4K7−8
−28.6%
9
+28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+0%
8
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−66.7%
10
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Hitman 3 7−8
+16.7%
6
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−15%
21−24
+15%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−500%
12
+500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Hitman 3 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−15%
21−24
+15%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+0%
11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Hitman 3 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−15%
21−24
+15%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−18.2%
13
+18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+160%
5
−160%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−5.4%
35−40
+5.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how HD 6770M and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 17% faster in 900p
  • HD 6770M is 85% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 17% faster in 1200p
  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 29% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6770M is 160% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6770M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 42 tests (72%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.50 3.14
Recency 4 January 2011 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 12 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has a 25.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6770M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Radeon HD 6770M
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 82 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 364 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.