Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon HD 6770M

Place in the ranking	834	483
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.63	11.11
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Whistler	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	4 January 2011 (13 years ago)	2 December 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	896
Core clock speed	725 MHz	1365 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1695 MHz
Number of transistors	716 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.40	94.92
Floating-point processing power	0.696 TFLOPS	3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	24	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.6
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6770M 2.50

T500 Mobile 8.79
+252%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6770M 1328

T500 Mobile 7996
+502%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 6770M 980

T500 Mobile 4225
+331%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	23 −248%	80−85 +248%
Full HD	25 −44%	36 +44%
1200p	12 −233%	40−45 +233%
1440p	4−5 −275%	15 +275%
4K	4−5 −325%	17 +325%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−180%

14−16
+180%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −175%	21−24 +175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	12−14
Battlefield 5	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −650%	30 +650%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −257%	24−27 +257%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Hitman 3	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −150%	50−55 +150%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −317%	24−27 +317%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −62.2%	60−65 +62.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −175%	21−24 +175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	12−14
Battlefield 5	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −600%	28 +600%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −257%	24−27 +257%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Hitman 3	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −150%	50−55 +150%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −317%	24−27 +317%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −115%	28 +115%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −62.2%	60−65 +62.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −175%	21−24 +175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	12−14
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −575%	27 +575%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Hitman 3	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −250%	70−75 +250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −218%	35−40 +218%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −46.2%	19 +46.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −62.2%	60−65 +62.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
−250%

21−24

+250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Hitman 3	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −307%	55−60 +307%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
−250%

21−24

+250%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	3−4

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
−250%

14−16

+250%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Hitman 3	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

This is how HD 6770M and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

T500 Mobile is 248% faster in 900p
T500 Mobile is 44% faster in 1080p
T500 Mobile is 233% faster in 1200p
T500 Mobile is 275% faster in 1440p
T500 Mobile is 325% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T500 Mobile is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T500 Mobile is ahead in 40 tests (63%)
there's a draw in 24 tests (38%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.50	8.79
Recency	4 January 2011	2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	18 Watt

T500 Mobile has a 251.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6770M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.