Quadro P4200 vs Radeon HD 6770M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6770M with Quadro P4200, including specs and performance data.

HD 6770M
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
2.50

P4200 outperforms HD 6770M by a whopping 907% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking832213
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.9017.26
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameWhistlerGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4802304
Core clock speed725 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1647 MHz
Number of transistors716 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate17.40237.2
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPS7.589 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6770M 2.50
Quadro P4200 25.17
+907%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6770M 964
Quadro P4200 10491
+988%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p23
−900%
230−240
+900%
Full HD24
−900%
240−250
+900%
1200p12
−900%
120−130
+900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−720%
40−45
+720%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 40−45
Battlefield 5 3−4
−2633%
80−85
+2633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−720%
40−45
+720%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−843%
65−70
+843%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1117%
140−150
+1117%
Hitman 3 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−480%
110−120
+480%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−4200%
85−90
+4200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−178%
100−110
+178%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 40−45
Battlefield 5 3−4
−2633%
80−85
+2633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−720%
40−45
+720%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−843%
65−70
+843%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1117%
140−150
+1117%
Hitman 3 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−480%
110−120
+480%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−4200%
85−90
+4200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−315%
50−55
+315%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−178%
100−110
+178%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 40−45
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−720%
40−45
+720%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1117%
140−150
+1117%
Hitman 3 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−480%
110−120
+480%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−315%
50−55
+315%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−178%
100−110
+178%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−867%
27−30
+867%
Hitman 3 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−643%
50−55
+643%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−914%
140−150
+914%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−600%
40−45
+600%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 10−12

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how HD 6770M and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 900% faster in 900p
  • Quadro P4200 is 900% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4200 is 900% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 4200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 57 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.50 25.17
Recency 4 January 2011 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt

HD 6770M has 185.7% lower power consumption.

Quadro P4200, on the other hand, has a 906.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6770M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Radeon HD 6770M
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 82 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 57 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.