Quadro FX 370 vs Radeon HD 6770

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6770 with Quadro FX 370, including specs and performance data.

HD 6770
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 108 Watt
3.24
+1373%

HD 6770 outperforms FX 370 by a whopping 1373% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7471379
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.59no data
Power efficiency2.060.43
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameJuniperG84
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date21 January 2011 (13 years ago)12 September 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 $129

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 6770 and FX 370 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80016
Core clock speedno data360 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,040 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate34.002.880
Floating-point processing power1.36 TFLOPS0.02304 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs408

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length198 mm198 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1111.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6770 3.24
+1373%
FX 370 0.22

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6770 1250
+1406%
FX 370 83

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.24 0.22
Recency 21 January 2011 12 September 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 35 Watt

HD 6770 has a 1372.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FX 370, on the other hand, has 208.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 6770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6770 is a desktop card while Quadro FX 370 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6770
Radeon HD 6770
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Quadro FX 370

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 352 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 10 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.