ATI Radeon 9250 PCI vs HD 6750

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking804not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.15no data
Power efficiency2.19no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameJuniperRV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date21 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 March 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores720no data
Core clock speedno data240 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,040 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)86 Wattno data
Texture fill rate25.200.96
Floating-point processing power1.008 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs364

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s3.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 118.1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 January 2011 1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

HD 6750 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6750 and Radeon 9250 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6750
Radeon HD 6750
ATI Radeon 9250 PCI
Radeon 9250 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 286 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.