UHD Graphics 770 vs Radeon HD 6730M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6730M with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.

HD 6730M
2011
1 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
1.38

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms HD 6730M by a whopping 346% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1008574
Place by popularitynot in top-10028
Power efficiency2.8429.58
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameWhistlerRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480256
Core clock speed725 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate17.4026.40
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6730M 1.38
UHD Graphics 770 6.15
+346%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6730M 4438
+67.2%
UHD Graphics 770 2655

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6730M 1141
UHD Graphics 770 16443
+1341%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p17
−341%
75−80
+341%
Full HD22
+22.2%
18
−22.2%
4K2−3
−550%
13
+550%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10
+150%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Hitman 3 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−164%
35−40
+164%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Hitman 3 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−164%
35−40
+164%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−125%
18
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−81.8%
20−22
+81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Hitman 3 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+16.7%
12
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−100%
16
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+22.2%
9
−22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 6−7
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 4−5

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 3−4
Far Cry 5 0−1 3−4

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+0%
13
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how HD 6730M and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 is 341% faster in 900p
  • HD 6730M is 22% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 770 is 550% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6730M is 22% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6730M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 46 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 18 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.38 6.15
Recency 4 January 2011 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has a 345.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6730M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6730M is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6730M
Radeon HD 6730M
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1218 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.