Radeon Graphics vs HD 6730M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6730M with Radeon Graphics, including specs and performance data.

HD 6730M
2011
1 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
1.37

Graphics outperforms HD 6730M by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1020902
Place by popularitynot in top-1008
Power efficiency2.699.13
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameWhistlerRenoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480448
Core clock speed725 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate17.4042.00
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPS1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2428

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Full HD23
−30.4%
30−35
+30.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Elden Ring 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Elden Ring 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Fortnite 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
World of Tanks 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Valorant 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Elden Ring 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how HD 6730M and Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Graphics is 41% faster in 900p
  • Graphics is 30% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.37 1.99
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics has a 45.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6730M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6730M is a notebook card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6730M
Radeon HD 6730M
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6540 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.