GeForce GTX 980MX vs Radeon HD 6730M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1008not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.82no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameWhistlerGM204
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4801664
Core clock speed725 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1178 MHz
Number of transistors716 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt148 Watt
Texture fill rate17.40122.5
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPS3.92 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24104

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 1 June 2016
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 148 Watt

HD 6730M has 322.9% lower power consumption.

GTX 980MX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6730M and GeForce GTX 980MX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6730M
Radeon HD 6730M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX
GeForce GTX 980MX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 26 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.