Quadro 600 vs Radeon HD 6670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6670 with Quadro 600, including specs and performance data.

HD 6670
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 66 Watt
1.88
+37.2%

HD 6670 outperforms 600 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9121014
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.080.15
Power efficiency1.952.35
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTurksGF108
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date19 April 2011 (13 years ago)13 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99 $179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro 600 has 88% better value for money than HD 6670.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48096
Core clock speedno data640 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors716 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)66 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2010.24
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS0.2458 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6670 1.88
+37.2%
Quadro 600 1.37

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6670 724
+36.9%
Quadro 600 529

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.88 1.37
Recency 19 April 2011 13 December 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 66 Watt 40 Watt

HD 6670 has a 37.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

Quadro 600, on the other hand, has 65% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 6670 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6670 is a desktop card while Quadro 600 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6670
Radeon HD 6670
NVIDIA Quadro 600
Quadro 600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 889 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 410 votes

Rate Quadro 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.