GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs Radeon HD 6650M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6650M and GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6650M
2011
1 GB DDR3
1.95

RTX 3060 Mobile outperforms HD 6650M by a whopping 1568% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking895164
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Power efficiencyno data29.33
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameWhistlerGA106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4803840
Core clock speed600 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors716 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data80 Watt
Texture fill rate14.40171.0
Floating-point processing power0.576 TFLOPS10.94 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs24120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6650M 1.95
RTX 3060 Mobile 32.52
+1568%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6650M 752
RTX 3060 Mobile 12550
+1569%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6650M 4051
RTX 3060 Mobile 57333
+1315%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6650M 1037
RTX 3060 Mobile 27419
+2544%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p19
−1479%
300−350
+1479%
Full HD17
−482%
99
+482%
1440p4−5
−1600%
68
+1600%
4K2−3
−1950%
41
+1950%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2475%
103
+2475%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−10500%
100−110
+10500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1220%
65−70
+1220%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2050%
86
+2050%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2333%
70−75
+2333%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1540%
80−85
+1540%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−2063%
170−180
+2063%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1667%
106
+1667%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−735%
140−150
+735%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−1050%
110−120
+1050%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−237%
110−120
+237%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−10500%
100−110
+10500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1220%
65−70
+1220%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1625%
69
+1625%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2333%
70−75
+2333%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1540%
80−85
+1540%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−2063%
170−180
+2063%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1700%
108
+1700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1012%
189
+1012%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2450%
102
+2450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−1480%
158
+1480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−467%
65−70
+467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−351%
158
+351%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1220%
65−70
+1220%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1450%
62
+1450%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2333%
70−75
+2333%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−2063%
170−180
+2063%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1500%
96
+1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−606%
120
+606%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−1300%
140
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−550%
78
+550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−31.4%
46
+31.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2300%
96
+2300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1967%
60−65
+1967%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−3700%
35−40
+3700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3800%
39
+3800%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%
Hitman 3 7−8
−814%
64
+814%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−1317%
85
+1317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4300%
40−45
+4300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−955%
116
+955%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1500%
80
+1500%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 20−22
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 19

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1367%
44
+1367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 164
+0%
164
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64
+0%
64
+0%
Metro Exodus 129
+0%
129
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
+0%
56
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
+0%
48
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 85
+0%
85
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
+0%
101
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 41
+0%
41
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 60
+0%
60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60
+0%
60
+0%

This is how HD 6650M and RTX 3060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Mobile is 1479% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3060 Mobile is 482% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 Mobile is 1600% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 Mobile is 1950% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3060 Mobile is 10500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Mobile is ahead in 53 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.95 32.52
Recency 4 January 2011 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm

RTX 3060 Mobile has a 1567.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6650M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6650M
Radeon HD 6650M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 54 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4900 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.