Matrox G450 vs Radeon HD 6620G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1124not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.75no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameSumoCondor
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 December 2011 (12 years ago)1 January 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400no data
Core clock speed444 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate8.8800.25
Floating-point processing power0.3552 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs202

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCI
Lengthno data150 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared332 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)6.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4None
OpenCL1.2None
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2011 1 January 2001
Chip lithography 32 nm 180 nm

HD 6620G has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6620G and Matrox G450. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6620G is a notebook card while Matrox G450 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Radeon HD 6620G
Matrox G450
G450

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 88 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6620G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Matrox G450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.