GeForce 805A vs Radeon HD 6610M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking989not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.87no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameWhistlerGK208
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)22 July 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480192
Core clock speed450 MHz719 MHz
Boost clock speedno data758 MHz
Number of transistors716 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate10.8012.13
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPS0.2911 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1001 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s16.02 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 22 July 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce 805A has an age advantage of 3 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 73.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6610M and GeForce 805A. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6610M
Radeon HD 6610M
NVIDIA GeForce 805A
GeForce 805A

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 805A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.