Quadro NVS 295 vs Radeon HD 6570M

Place in the ranking	990	1363
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.39	0.73
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Capilano	G98
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	26 November 2010 (14 years ago)	7 May 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$54.50

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	8
Core clock speed	650 MHz	540 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	210 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	23 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.00	4.320
Floating-point processing power	0.52 TFLOPS	0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	4
TMUs	20	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	695 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	11.12 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

2x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.0	4.0
OpenGL	4.4	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	-	1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

24
+700%

3−4

−700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

18.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	3−4	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +560%	5−6 −560%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	3−4	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +560%	5−6 −560%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	3−4	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +560%	5−6 −560%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2	0−1
Hitman 3	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

0−1

This is how HD 6570M and NVS 295 compete in popular games:

HD 6570M is 700% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.46	0.24
Recency	26 November 2010	7 May 2009
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	23 Watt

HD 6570M has a 508.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 295, on the other hand, has 30.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 6570M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 295 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6570M is a notebook card while Quadro NVS 295 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.