Quadro NVS 300M vs Radeon HD 6570

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking998not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Power efficiency1.66no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameTurksG73
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date19 April 2011 (13 years ago)24 May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48013
Core clock speedno data500 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors716 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt16 Watt
Texture fill rate15.602.000
Floating-point processing power0.624 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
UVD+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 119.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2011 24 May 2006
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 16 Watt

HD 6570 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 300M, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6570 and Quadro NVS 300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6570 is a desktop card while Quadro NVS 300M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6570
Radeon HD 6570
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M
Quadro NVS 300M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 771 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.