FirePro S7150 vs Radeon HD 6570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6570 with FirePro S7150, including specs and performance data.

HD 6570
2011
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
1.43

S7150 outperforms HD 6570 by a whopping 585% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1000459
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.070.59
Power efficiency1.634.47
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameTurksTonga
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date19 April 2011 (13 years ago)1 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 $2,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro S7150 has 743% better value for money than HD 6570.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4802048
Core clock speedno data920 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors716 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate15.60117.8
Floating-point processing power0.624 TFLOPS3.768 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs24128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm241 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
UVD+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6570 1.43
FirePro S7150 9.79
+585%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6570 550
FirePro S7150 3770
+585%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.43 9.79
Recency 19 April 2011 1 February 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 150 Watt

HD 6570 has 275% lower power consumption.

FirePro S7150, on the other hand, has a 584.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro S7150 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6570 is a desktop card while FirePro S7150 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6570
Radeon HD 6570
AMD FirePro S7150
FirePro S7150

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 778 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 9 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.