GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics with GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
2012
1.35

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics by a whopping 5695% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10129
Place by popularitynot in top-10014
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.31
Power efficiencyno data25.66
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameno dataAD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 February 2012 (12 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4807168
Core clock speed400 / 700 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data220 Watt
Texture fill rateno data554.4
Floating-point processing powerno data35.48 TFLOPS
ROPsno data80
TMUsno data224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics 1.35
RTX 4070 SUPER 78.23
+5695%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics 1006
RTX 4070 SUPER 68373
+6697%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−7333%
223
+7333%
1440p2−3
−7200%
146
+7200%
4K1−2
−8300%
84
+8300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5650%
230−240
+5650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2550%
150−160
+2550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5650%
230−240
+5650%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11700%
110−120
+11700%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−6367%
190−200
+6367%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−12300%
240−250
+12300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1886%
270−280
+1886%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6100%
120−130
+6100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−4113%
300−350
+4113%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−367%
150−160
+367%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2550%
150−160
+2550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5650%
230−240
+5650%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11700%
110−120
+11700%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−6367%
190−200
+6367%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−12300%
240−250
+12300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1886%
270−280
+1886%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6100%
120−130
+6100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−5250%
428
+5250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1455%
170−180
+1455%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−367%
150−160
+367%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2550%
150−160
+2550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5650%
230−240
+5650%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11700%
110−120
+11700%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−12300%
240−250
+12300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1886%
270−280
+1886%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−4663%
381
+4663%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1727%
201
+1727%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−321%
139
+321%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6100%
120−130
+6100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−16500%
160−170
+16500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−5500%
110−120
+5500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−9200%
90−95
+9200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 80−85
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8300%
80−85
+8300%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1529%
110−120
+1529%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−4020%
200−210
+4020%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−15300%
154
+15300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−3900%
240−250
+3900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2975%
120−130
+2975%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 65−70

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6600%
65−70
+6600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−6300%
60−65
+6300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 50−55
Far Cry 5 0−1 50−55

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 265
+0%
265
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hitman 3 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 133
+0%
133
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 132
+0%
132
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
+0%
62
+0%

This is how HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 7333% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 7200% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 8300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 16500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is ahead in 43 tests (69%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (31%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.35 78.23
Recency 8 February 2012 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm

RTX 4070 SUPER has a 5694.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6520G HD 7450M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3229 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.