GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon HD 6450M

Place in the ranking	1182	385
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	11.97
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Seymour	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 January 2011 (13 years ago)	28 June 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	160	512
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1740 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	370 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.800	57.12
Floating-point processing power	0.192 TFLOPS	1.828 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	16
TMUs	8	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.6
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−1775%

150−160
+1775%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−1733%

55−60
+1733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1775%	75−80 +1775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1800%	95−100 +1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −1809%	210−220 +1809%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −1733%	110−120 +1733%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −1733%	550−600 +1733%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1775%	75−80 +1775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1800%	95−100 +1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −1809%	210−220 +1809%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −1733%	110−120 +1733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −1800%	190−200 +1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −1733%	550−600 +1733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1775%	75−80 +1775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1800%	95−100 +1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −1809%	210−220 +1809%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −1733%	110−120 +1733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −1800%	190−200 +1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −1733%	550−600 +1733%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−1700%

18−20
+1700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1733%	110−120 +1733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−1733%

55−60
+1733%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1650%

35−40
+1650%

This is how HD 6450M and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

GTX 1630 is 1775% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.65	12.91
Recency	4 January 2011	28 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm

GTX 1630 has a 1886.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6450M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6450M is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1630 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.