GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon HD 6380G

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6380G with GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

HD 6380G
2011
35 Watt
0.52

RTX 3060 Ti outperforms HD 6380G by a whopping 10117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking122949
Place by popularitynot in top-10023
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0169.03
Power efficiency1.0218.20
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameSuperSumoGA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)1 December 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399.99 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3060 Ti has 690200% better value for money than HD 6380G.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1604864
Core clock speed400 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200253.1
Floating-point processing power0.128 TFLOPS16.2 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs8152
Tensor Coresno data152
Ray Tracing Coresno data38

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6380G 0.52
RTX 3060 Ti 53.13
+10117%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6380G 200
RTX 3060 Ti 20469
+10135%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−14000%
141
+14000%
1440p0−178
4K-0−148

Cost per frame, $

1080p399.992.83
1440pno data5.12
4Kno data8.31

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2667%
83
+2667%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2925%
121
+2925%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3333%
100−110
+3333%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2600%
81
+2600%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−12800%
120−130
+12800%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2140%
110−120
+2140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−1960%
200−210
+1960%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−3383%
200−210
+3383%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−380%
140−150
+380%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−4800%
196
+4800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3333%
100−110
+3333%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2500%
78
+2500%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−12800%
120−130
+12800%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2140%
110−120
+2140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−1960%
200−210
+1960%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−3100%
192
+3100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−380%
140−150
+380%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1775%
75
+1775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3333%
100−110
+3333%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2467%
77
+2467%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2140%
110−120
+2140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−1300%
140
+1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2800%
174
+2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−820%
92
+820%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−157%
77
+157%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−8100%
80−85
+8100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 65
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5100%
52
+5100%
Far Cry 5 0−1 60−65
Hitman 3 6−7
−1133%
70−75
+1133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−3700%
114
+3700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−24600%
247
+24600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2933%
90−95
+2933%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4400%
45
+4400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 40

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95
+0%
95
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 81
+0%
81
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74
+0%
74
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 173
+0%
173
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+0%
60
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Metro Exodus 93
+0%
93
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 139
+0%
139
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hitman 3 57
+0%
57
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+0%
77
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 103
+0%
103
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+0%
84
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
+0%
33
+0%

This is how HD 6380G and RTX 3060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Ti is 14000% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3060 Ti is 24600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Ti is ahead in 34 tests (49%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.52 53.13
Recency 14 June 2011 1 December 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 200 Watt

HD 6380G has 471.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 3060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 10117.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6380G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6380G is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6380G
Radeon HD 6380G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 36 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6380G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 15531 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.