GeForce 610M vs Radeon HD 6370M
Aggregate performance score
GeForce 610M outperforms Radeon HD 6370M by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 1130 | 1118 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | 0.13 |
Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
GPU code name | Robson XT | N13M-GE |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 November 2010 (13 years ago) | 6 December 2011 (12 years ago) |
Current price | $338 | $55 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GeForce 610M has 1200% better value for money than HD 6370M.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 80 | 48 |
CUDA cores | no data | 48 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 672 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 900 MHz |
Number of transistors | 292 million | 292 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 11 Watt | 12 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 6.000 | Up to 7.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 120 gflops | 129.02 gflops |
Video decoders | no data | H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon HD 6370M and GeForce 610M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Bus support | no data | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | Up to 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDMI | no data | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | no data | Up to 2048x1536 |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce 610M outperforms Radeon HD 6370M by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
GeForce 610M outperforms Radeon HD 6370M by 6% in Passmark.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GeForce 610M outperforms Radeon HD 6370M by 68% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce 610M is 9% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GeForce 610M is ahead in 3 tests (9%)
- there's a draw in 29 tests (91%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.71 | 0.75 |
Recency | 26 November 2010 | 6 December 2011 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 11 Watt | 12 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 6370M and GeForce 610M.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.