Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs HD 6370D IGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated376
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.58
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameSuperSumoVega 12
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 November 2011 (13 years ago)14 November 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1601280
Core clock speed443 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1283 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate3.544102.6
Floating-point processing power0.1418 TFLOPS3.284 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared1024 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared740 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data189.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 14 November 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

HD 6370D IGP has 53.8% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 20, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6370D IGP and Radeon Pro Vega 20. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6370D IGP is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP
Radeon HD 6370D IGP
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6370D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 86 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.