Quadro NVS 280 PCI vs Radeon HD 6370D IGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1486
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.11
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameSuperSumoNV34 B1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 November 2011 (13 years ago)28 October 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160no data
Core clock speed443 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate3.5441.100
Floating-point processing power0.1418 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 28 October 2003
Chip lithography 32 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 13 Watt

HD 6370D IGP has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 368.8% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 PCI, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6370D IGP and Quadro NVS 280 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6370D IGP is a desktop card while Quadro NVS 280 PCI is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP
Radeon HD 6370D IGP
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Quadro NVS 280 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6370D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 280 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.