Radeon Vega 7 vs HD 6320

Place in the ranking	1265	532
Place by popularity	not in top-100	18
Power efficiency	1.45	11.38
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Loveland	Cezanne
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 August 2011 (13 years ago)	13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$554.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	448
Core clock speed	508 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	600 MHz	1900 MHz
Number of transistors	450 million	9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.064	53.20
Floating-point processing power	0.08128 TFLOPS	1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	8
TMUs	8	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6320 0.38

Vega 7 7.47
+1866%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6320 302

Vega 7 5249
+1638%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −2100%	22 +2100%
1440p	1−2 −3100%	32 +3100%
4K	0−1	16

Cost per frame, $

1080p	554.99	no data
1440p	554.99	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−1650%

35−40
+1650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1775%	75−80 +1775%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1775%	150−160 +1775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1775%	75−80 +1775%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −1864%	550−600 +1864%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1775%	75−80 +1775%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1775%	150−160 +1775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1775%	75−80 +1775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1789%	170−180 +1789%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −1864%	550−600 +1864%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1775%	75−80 +1775%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1775%	150−160 +1775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1775%	75−80 +1775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1789%	170−180 +1789%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −1864%	550−600 +1864%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −1733%	110−120 +1733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1650%

35−40
+1650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1650%

35−40
+1650%

This is how HD 6320 and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

Vega 7 is 2100% faster in 1080p
Vega 7 is 3100% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.38	7.47
Recency	15 August 2011	13 April 2021
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	45 Watt

HD 6320 has 150% lower power consumption.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has a 1865.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6320 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.