ATI Radeon 8500 XT vs HD 6320
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | Rage 7 (2001−2006) |
| GPU code name | Loveland | R250 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 August 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 June 2002 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $554.99 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 80 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 508 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 600 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | 60 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 4.064 | 2.400 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.08128 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | AGP 4x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 9.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 8.1 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 August 2011 | 1 June 2002 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 25 Watt |
HD 6320 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6320 and Radeon 8500 XT. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 6320 is a notebook card while Radeon 8500 XT is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
