A10G vs Radeon HD 6320

Place in the ranking	1264	66
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.47	22.57
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Loveland	GA102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	15 August 2011 (13 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$554.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	9216
Core clock speed	508 MHz	1320 MHz
Boost clock speed	600 MHz	1710 MHz
Number of transistors	450 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.064	492.5
Floating-point processing power	0.08128 TFLOPS	31.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	96
TMUs	8	288
Tensor Cores	no data	288
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	12 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	600.2 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.6
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6320 0.38

A10G 48.54
+12674%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6320 147

A10G 18723
+12637%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−12400%

250−260
+12400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −11567%	350−400 +11567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −12400%	250−260 +12400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −12400%	250−260 +12400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −12400%	500−550 +12400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −12400%	1000−1050 +12400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −12400%	500−550 +12400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −12579%	3550−3600 +12579%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −11567%	350−400 +11567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −12400%	250−260 +12400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −12400%	250−260 +12400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −12400%	500−550 +12400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −12400%	1000−1050 +12400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −12400%	500−550 +12400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −12122%	1100−1150 +12122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −12579%	3550−3600 +12579%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −11567%	350−400 +11567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −12400%	250−260 +12400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −12400%	250−260 +12400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −12400%	500−550 +12400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −12400%	1000−1050 +12400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −12400%	500−550 +12400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −12122%	1100−1150 +12122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −12579%	3550−3600 +12579%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −12400%	750−800 +12400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −12400%	250−260 +12400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−12400%

250−260
+12400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −11900%	120−130 +11900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−12400%

250−260
+12400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.38	48.54
Recency	15 August 2011	12 April 2021
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	150 Watt

HD 6320 has 733.3% lower power consumption.

A10G, on the other hand, has a 12673.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The A10G is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6320 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6320 is a notebook card while A10G is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.