Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Radeon HD 6230

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1238not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.66no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameParkDG2-512
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 July 2011 (13 years ago)24 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores804096
Core clock speed650 MHz1950 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors292 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate5.200524.8
Floating-point processing power0.104 TFLOPS16.79 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed667 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2011 24 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 150 Watt

HD 6230 has 689.5% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Flex 170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6230 and Data Center GPU Flex 170. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6230 is a desktop card while Data Center GPU Flex 170 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6230
Radeon HD 6230
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
Data Center GPU Flex 170

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Flex 170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.