Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs ATI Radeon HD 5850

Place in the ranking	619	622
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.64	no data
Power efficiency	2.38	14.25
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code name	Cypress	DG1
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	30 September 2009 (15 years ago)	31 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$299	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1440	768
Core clock speed	725 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	2,154 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	52.20	79.20
Floating-point processing power	2.088 TFLOPS	2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	24
TMUs	72	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	68.26 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5850 5.15
+0.8%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 5.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5850 1988
+0.9%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1971

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

ATI HD 5850 3401

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 8214
+142%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	59 +7.3%	55−60 −7.3%
Full HD	56 +107%	27 −107%
1440p	16−18 −6.3%	17 +6.3%
4K	14−16 −7.1%	15 +7.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.34	no data
1440p	18.69	no data
4K	21.36	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10

−100%

18−20
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −92.9%	27−30 +92.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −280%	19 +280%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −177%	35−40 +177%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −109%	21−24 +109%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −129%	30−35 +129%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −130%	75−80 +130%
Hitman 3	10−12 −118%	24 +118%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −84.8%	60−65 +84.8%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −375%	57 +375%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −136%	33 +136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −106%	35−40 +106%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −44.7%	65−70 +44.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −92.9%	27−30 +92.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −20%	6 +20%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −177%	35−40 +177%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −109%	21−24 +109%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −129%	30−35 +129%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −130%	75−80 +130%
Hitman 3	10−12 −109%	23 +109%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −84.8%	60−65 +84.8%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −258%	43 +258%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −129%	30−35 +129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −83.3%	33 +83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −61.1%	27−30 +61.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −44.7%	65−70 +44.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −92.9%	27−30 +92.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −109%	21−24 +109%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −130%	75−80 +130%
Hitman 3	10−12 −90.9%	21 +90.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +26.9%	26 −26.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −61.1%	29 +61.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −44.7%	65−70 +44.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−78.6%

25
+78.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −120%	21−24 +120%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −113%	16−18 +113%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	8−9
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −350%	50−55 +350%
Hitman 3	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −91.7%	21−24 +91.7%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −125%	70−75 +125%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

−111%

18−20
+111%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Hitman 3	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −550%	50−55 +550%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1000%	11 +1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−83.3%

10−12
+83.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

+0%

This is how ATI HD 5850 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:

ATI HD 5850 is 7% faster in 900p
ATI HD 5850 is 107% faster in 1080p
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 6% faster in 1440p
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 7% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI HD 5850 is 27% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

ATI HD 5850 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is ahead in 66 tests (94%)
there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.15	5.11
Recency	30 September 2009	31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	25 Watt

ATI HD 5850 has a 0.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 504% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 5850 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5850 is a desktop card while Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.