GeForce GT 630 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5850

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5850 and GeForce GT 630 OEM, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 5850
2009
1 GB GDDR5, 151 Watt
5.15
+210%

ATI HD 5850 outperforms GT 630 OEM by a whopping 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking620943
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.64no data
Power efficiency2.372.31
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameCypressGK107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 September 2009 (15 years ago)24 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1440192
Core clock speed725 MHz875 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate52.2014.00
Floating-point processing power2.088 TFLOPS0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs7216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s28.51 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p59
+228%
18−20
−228%
Full HD56
+211%
18−20
−211%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.34no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Hitman 3 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+236%
14−16
−236%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Hitman 3 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+236%
14−16
−236%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Hitman 3 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+236%
14−16
−236%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Hitman 3 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

This is how ATI HD 5850 and GT 630 OEM compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5850 is 228% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 5850 is 211% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.15 1.66
Recency 30 September 2009 24 April 2012
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 50 Watt

ATI HD 5850 has a 210.2% higher aggregate performance score.

GT 630 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 202% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 5850 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630 OEM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5850
Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
GeForce GT 630 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 253 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.