GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5830
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 5830 and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ATI HD 5830 outperforms GTS 450 Rev. 2 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 656 | 661 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.78 | 2.88 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | Cypress | GF116 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 February 2010 (14 years ago) | 15 March 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1120 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 783 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,154 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 175 Watt | 106 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 44.80 | 25.06 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.792 TFLOPS | 0.6013 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56 | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 282 mm | 210 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 57.73 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| HDMI | + | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 2.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.49 | 4.41 |
| Recency | 25 February 2010 | 15 March 2011 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 175 Watt | 106 Watt |
ATI HD 5830 has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score.
GTS 450 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 65.1% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 5830 and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
