GeForce 9800S vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking668not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.89no data
Power efficiency2.81no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameJuniperG94
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 October 2009 (15 years ago)15 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80064
Core clock speed850 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate34.0019.20
Floating-point processing power1.36 TFLOPS0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length208 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF + HDA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 October 2009 15 July 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 75 Watt

ATI HD 5770 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9800S, on the other hand, has 44% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 5770 and GeForce 9800S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5770 is a desktop card while GeForce 9800S is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5770
Radeon HD 5770
NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
GeForce 9800S

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 673 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9800S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.