Radeon HD 8280E vs ATI HD 5670

Place in the ranking	874	1182
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.26	no data
Power efficiency	2.27	3.07
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code name	Redwood	Kalindi
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	14 January 2010 (14 years ago)	23 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$119	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	128
Core clock speed	775 MHz	450 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	64 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	15.50	3.600
Floating-point processing power	0.62 TFLOPS	0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	4
TMUs	20	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.0	6.3
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5670 2.08
+215%

HD 8280E 0.66

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5670 802
+213%

HD 8280E 256

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	26 +225%	8−9 −225%
Full HD	33 +230%	10−12 −230%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.61

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6
+400%

1−2

−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	3−4	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Hitman 3	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +260%	10−11 −260%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	3−4	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Hitman 3	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +260%	10−11 −260%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	3−4	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Hitman 3	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +260%	10−11 −260%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+300%

1−2

−300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
+400%

1−2

−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1