GeForce 8400 GS vs ATI Radeon HD 4860

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.70
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV790G86
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date9 September 2009 (15 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$29.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64016
Core clock speed700 MHz459 MHz
Number of transistors959 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate22.403.672
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS0.02938 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Standard memory config per GPUno data256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 September 2009 17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 40 Watt

ATI HD 4860 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

8400 GS, on the other hand, has 225% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4860 and GeForce 8400 GS. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4860
Radeon HD 4860
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
GeForce 8400 GS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 10 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 614 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.