H3C XG310 vs ATI Radeon HD 4720

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameRV730DG1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 December 2011 (12 years ago)11 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320768
Core clock speed600 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors514 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2052.80
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs3248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length193 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed667 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth21.34 GB/s68.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2011 11 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 300 Watt

ATI HD 4720 has 445.5% lower power consumption.

H3C XG310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4720 and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4720 is a desktop card while H3C XG310 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4720
Radeon HD 4720
Intel H3C XG310
H3C XG310

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4720 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.