RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 4700

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated92
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.51
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV730no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 February 2010 (14 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3204608
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors514 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate19.20no data
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length193 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 February 2010 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 115 Watt

ATI HD 4700 has 130% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4700 and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4700 is a desktop card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4700
Radeon HD 4700
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 20 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.