ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory vs ATI HD 4670

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1106not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.15no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameRV730RV370
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 September 2008 (16 years ago)25 October 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$67 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed750 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors514 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate24.001.300
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs324

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length193 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s4.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2008 25 October 2006
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 30 Watt

ATI HD 4670 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X300 SE HyperMemory, on the other hand, has 96.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4670 and Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4670
Radeon HD 4670
ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 149 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.