GeForce 210 PCI vs ATI Radeon HD 4670

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1108not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.16no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRV730GT216
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 September 2008 (16 years ago)12 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$67 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32016
Core clock speed750 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors514 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate24.003.800
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length193 mm145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2008 12 October 2009
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 31 Watt

210 PCI has an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 90.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4670 and GeForce 210 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4670
Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
GeForce 210 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 149 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 77 votes

Rate GeForce 210 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.