RTX 6000 Ada vs ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated15
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.71
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV730AD102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 July 2007 (17 years ago)3 December 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32018176
Core clock speed750 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2505 MHz
Number of transistors514 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate24.001,423
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs8192
TMUs32568

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Length193 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s768.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 July 2007 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 300 Watt

ATI HD 4670 AGP has 408.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4670 AGP and RTX 6000 Ada. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP
Radeon HD 4670 AGP
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
RTX 6000 Ada

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4670 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 69 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.