GeForce GT 630M vs ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1002
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.92
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRV730GF108
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 July 2007 (17 years ago)22 March 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32096
Core clock speed750 MHzUp to 800 MHz
Number of transistors514 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0010.56
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS0.2534 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfaceAGP 8xMXM-A (3.0)
Length193 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3\GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 BitUp to 128bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sUp to 32.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI++
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
DirectX 11.2no data12 API
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.5
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 July 2007 22 March 2012
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 33 Watt

GT 630M has an age advantage of 4 years, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 78.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4670 AGP and GeForce GT 630M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4670 AGP is a desktop card while GeForce GT 630M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP
Radeon HD 4670 AGP
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GeForce GT 630M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4670 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 893 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.