Radeon HD 8280E vs ATI HD 4650

Place in the ranking	1196	1182
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.90	3.07
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code name	RV730	Kalindi
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	10 September 2008 (16 years ago)	23 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	128
Core clock speed	600 MHz	450 MHz
Number of transistors	514 million	1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	48 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	19.20	3.600
Floating-point processing power	0.384 TFLOPS	0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	4
TMUs	32	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
Length	193 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	22.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	4.1	6.3
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4650 0.62

HD 8280E 0.66
+6.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4650 238

HD 8280E 256
+7.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.62	0.66
Recency	10 September 2008	23 April 2013
Chip lithography	55 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	48 Watt	15 Watt

HD 8280E has a 6.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 4650 and Radeon HD 8280E.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4650 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 8280E is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.