ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs ATI HD 4650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4650 and Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 4650
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 48 Watt
0.63
+117%

ATI HD 4650 outperforms ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11951340
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.900.57
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRV730RV630
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 September 2008 (16 years ago)28 June 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320120
Core clock speed600 MHz594 MHz
Number of transistors514 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate19.204.752
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS0.1426 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length193 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz396 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s12.67 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4650 0.63
+117%
ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP 0.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4650 243
+121%
ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP 110

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 0.29
Recency 10 September 2008 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 35 Watt

ATI HD 4650 has a 117.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 37.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 4650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4650
Radeon HD 4650
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 227 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.