UHD Graphics 24EU vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1269not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.29no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRV710Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 September 2008 (16 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80192
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80014.40
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs46
TMUs812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 2008 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 24EU has an age advantage of 13 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4350 and UHD Graphics 24EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4350 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 24EU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4350
Radeon HD 4350
Intel UHD Graphics 24EU
UHD Graphics 24EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 220 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 24EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.