GeForce MX330 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

Place in the ranking	1272	579
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.28	43.61
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	RV710	GP108
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	30 September 2008 (16 years ago)	10 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	384
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1531 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1594 MHz
Number of transistors	242 million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	10 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.800	38.26
Floating-point processing power	0.096 TFLOPS	1.224 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	16
TMUs	8	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	400 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	6.4 GB/s	48.06 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DisplayPort

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4350 0.37

GeForce MX330 6.32
+1608%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4350 144

GeForce MX330 2429
+1587%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	6 −283%	23 +283%
4K	1−2 −2300%	24 +2300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −550%	12−14 +550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −420%	24−27 +420%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −550%	26 +550%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3 +50%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −529%	44 +529%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −420%	24−27 +420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −657%	53 +657%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −300%	20−22 +300%
World of Tanks	14−16 −607%	95−100 +607%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3 +50%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −314%	27−30 +314%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −420%	24−27 +420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −643%	50−55 +643%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−1750%

35−40
+1750%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Valorant	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	5−6
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Dota 2	14−16 −60%	24 +60%
Valorant	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

16−18

+0%

16−18

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	24 +0%	24 +0%
Metro Exodus	24 +0%	24 +0%
Valorant	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Dota 2	23 +0%	23 +0%
Elden Ring	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Fortnite	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	11 +0%	11 +0%
Valorant	15 +0%	15 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	11 +0%	11 +0%
Dota 2	64 +0%	64 +0%
Valorant	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Elden Ring	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
World of Tanks	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Fortnite	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

This is how ATI HD 4350 and GeForce MX330 compete in popular games:

GeForce MX330 is 283% faster in 1080p
GeForce MX330 is 2300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX330 is 1750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce MX330 is ahead in 31 test (52%)
there's a draw in 29 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.37	6.32
Recency	30 September 2008	10 February 2020
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	10 Watt

GeForce MX330 has a 1608.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4350 is a desktop card while GeForce MX330 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.