GeForce GT 520 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

Place in the ranking	1273	1145
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.01
Power efficiency	1.27	1.92
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	RV710	GF119
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	30 September 2008 (16 years ago)	13 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$59

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	48
Core clock speed	600 MHz	810 MHz
Number of transistors	242 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	29 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	102 °C
Texture fill rate	4.800	6.480
Floating-point processing power	0.096 TFLOPS	0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	4
TMUs	8	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	16x PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Height	no data	2.7" (6.9 cm)
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	1 GB (DDR3)
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	400 MHz	900 MHz (DDR3)
Memory bandwidth	6.4 GB/s	14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DisplayPort	Dual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional)
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.2
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 4350 0.37

GT 520 0.81
+119%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4350 142

GT 520 311
+119%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−100%

12−14
+100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

4.92

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−100%

4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −114%	60−65 +114%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −114%	60−65 +114%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −114%	60−65 +114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−100%

4−5
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−100%

4−5
+100%

This is how ATI HD 4350 and GT 520 compete in popular games:

GT 520 is 100% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.37	0.81
Recency	30 September 2008	13 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	1 GB (DDR3)
Chip lithography	55 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	29 Watt

ATI HD 4350 has 45% lower power consumption.

GT 520, on the other hand, has a 118.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4350 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.